Dutch passive voice: worden vs zijn explained

One English sentence, two different Dutch meanings

English has a passive voice too, and it can mark the same difference Dutch cares about. "Is being sold" is for something still happening. "Is sold" is for something already done. But in everyday English speech, people blur the two together. They say "is sold" either way and trust the listener to figure out which one they mean from context. Dutch doesn't let you blur it. Dutch uses two different helper verbs for the passive voice, and picking the wrong one changes what you're actually saying, not just how it sounds.

How to form passive voice in Dutch: worden vs zijn

Dutch builds the passive voice with a helper verb plus a past participle, similar to English. But Dutch has two helper verbs to pick from, and each one carries a different meaning.

Worden plus a past participle is the process passive. It describes an action in progress. Something is happening, or being done to someone or something, and it's not finished yet.

Zijn plus a past participle is the state passive. It describes the result of an action that already happened. The thing is already in its finished condition. Think of it as "is already done" or "is finished," not "is happening."

So the choice isn't a grammar rule for its own sake. It's about whether you're describing an action or a result. Is something happening, or is something done?

Worth knowing: some Dutch courses place this topic around level A2. Most other methods place it a bit later, around B1. Don't worry about the exact label. Focus on the process versus state difference instead, that's what actually matters when you're speaking.

Worked examples

Let's start simple and build up.

Het huis wordt verkocht.

The house is being sold.

The sale is in progress. Maybe there's a real estate agent showing people around this week. Nothing is final yet.

Het huis is verkocht.

The house is sold.

Same house, same English word "sold," but a different situation in Dutch. The deal is closed. Someone already bought it. This sentence describes the result, not the action.

Now let's add who's doing the action. Dutch marks the person or thing doing the action with door, which introduces the agent in a passive sentence. Don't reach for van here, even though English uses "by" in this spot.

De ramen worden door de schoonmaker gewassen.

The windows are being washed by the cleaner.

The cleaner is out there right now, washing the windows. The action is still happening, so it's worden. Door introduces the cleaner as the one doing the washing.

Here's the state version of a similar sentence:

De ramen zijn gewassen.

The windows are washed.

No cleaner mentioned, and no need to mention one. The windows are just clean now. That's the finished state, and it's also a very natural, everyday way to describe something without naming who did it.

One more pair:

Het boek wordt geschreven.

The book is being written.

The author is still writing it. It isn't finished yet.

Het boek is geschreven.

The book is written.

It's done. The book exists.

The perfect tense: when zijn hides a worden action

This is the part that trips people up the most. When you put a worden-passive into the perfect tense (the tense you use for "has happened" or "has been done"), the past participle geworden drops out entirely. Geworden is the past participle of worden, and in this one spot, Dutch just leaves it out.

You don't say is geworden gewassen (literally "is become washed"). You say is gewassen ("has been washed"). Here's a full example:

De ramen zijn net gewassen.

The windows have just been washed.

Look closely and this is the exact same wording as the plain state passive from earlier, de ramen zijn gewassen ("the windows are washed"). In form, they're identical. So how do you tell them apart?

Context and timeframe words do the work. Net ("just") signals a recent event, meaning you're looking at the perfect tense of a worden-passive, an action that just happened. A door-phrase naming who did it points the same way. Without those cues, the sentence usually just describes the current state, and in everyday speech, that's normally the reading people mean anyway.

Where English speakers go wrong

Common mistake: using zijn when you mean worden, or the other way around. English blurs the process and state readings together under one "is" most of the time, and that habit carries over into Dutch. English speakers often reach for zijn, because it literally means "to be" and feels like the safe default. They stop checking whether they actually mean an action in progress or a finished result.

If you say Het huis is verkocht ("The house is sold") when the sale is actually still in progress, you've just told someone the deal is already closed. That can cause real confusion in a real conversation, not just an awkward grammar slip.

Common mistake: reaching for van instead of door for the agent. English uses "by," and van feels like the natural word-for-word match. Dutch always uses door for the agent in a passive sentence. De ramen worden door de schoonmaker gewassen, not van de schoonmaker ("by the cleaner," not "of the cleaner").

Common mistake: keeping geworden in the perfect tense. As covered above, it drops out. Is gewassen ("has been washed"), not is geworden gewassen.

This mix-up between worden and zijn is one of the most common Dutch passive-voice mistakes for English speakers, mainly because English never forces you to make the same choice so explicitly.

A few more things worth knowing

Dutch also has an impersonal passive, where there's no real subject at all, just an action happening in general. Dutch fills the subject spot with the dummy word er.

Er wordt gelachen.

There's laughing going on.

Er wordt gedanst.

There's dancing going on.

Nobody specific is named as doing the laughing or the dancing. It's just happening, by people in general. This shows up a lot in everyday Dutch when describing a party, an event, or the mood in a room.

News headlines and history texts often use the simple past passive instead, built with werd rather than wordt.

Het huis werd verkocht.

The house was sold.

You'll run into werd constantly once you start reading Dutch news. In a headline or a history text, werd usually describes something that happened and finished in the past, the way you'd read an ordinary past-tense sentence in English, not something still in progress at the time being described. This article focuses mainly on the present and perfect forms, but recognizing werd helps once you're reading real Dutch text.

Putting it together

1. Worden plus a past participle describes an action in progress, not yet finished.
2. Zijn plus a past participle describes a result, something already finished.
3. The agent doing the action, if you name one, is introduced with door. Don't reach for van.
4. In the perfect tense, the past participle geworden drops out. The sentence then surfaces as zijn plus the main participle, like is gewassen.
5. Context words like net, or a door-phrase, tell you when a zijn-plus-participle sentence is actually the perfect tense of a worden-passive rather than a plain state.
6. Er wordt plus a participle describes something happening in general, with no specific subject named. In the past, you'll see this as werd instead.

Go practice this

Pick five everyday actions around your house: cooking dinner, washing dishes, cleaning a room, making the bed, walking the dog. Write both versions for each one, the process with worden and the finished result with zijn. Saying them out loud helps the difference stick better than just reading them.

Next time you read a Dutch news headline or a sign in a shop window, look for a passive construction and ask yourself: is this describing something happening, or something already done? You'll start noticing the pattern everywhere once you're looking for it.

I built Tanaar to help people like you learn Dutch in their own time. Practice grammar, vocabulary and build your familiarity with concepts like the worden vs zijn passive voice distinction. It's free to start and practice weekly.